You can check every line of this page.
Seven sources hold up this formula: the regulation that lets us make the three claims, the EFSA opinion behind the folate claim, the regulation that sets the reference values, a meta-analysis on B vitamins and homocysteine, and the three EFSA reviews that set, or decline to set, an upper limit.
REGULATIONRegulation (EU) 432/2012 — list of permitted health claims made on foodshomocysteine claims for vitamin B12, folate and vitamin B6
EFSAEFSA Journal 2009;7(9):1213 — scientific opinion on folate (DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1213)backs the folate homocysteine claim
NRVRegulation (EU) 1169/2011, Annex XIII Part A — nutrient reference valuesthe % NRV column
META-ANALYSISWald, Law & Morris 2002, BMJ — Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: evidence on causality from a meta-analysis (DOI 10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1202)cited for B vitamins and homocysteine, not for any heart claim
EFSA ULEFSA Journal 2023 — tolerable upper intake level for folate, 1,000 µg per daywe serve 800 µg
EFSA ULEFSA Journal 2023 — tolerable upper intake level for vitamin B6, 12 mg per daywe serve 2 mg
EFSA DRVEFSA Journal 2015 — Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for cobalamin (vitamin B12)no upper limit set; we serve 500 µg
WHAT IS NOT PROVEN YET
This formula has not completed clinical validation. Its three ingredients rest on published work and each on an authorised EU claim, but the combination itself has not been tested by us in a trial. When it is, the result goes on this page, whatever it says.